Per Persson examines the overwhelming defeat of the Social Democratic Party in the recent elections and explains why, after more than twelve years of uninterrupted governance, the Swedish people have decided to change governments. Not only did the Social Democratic Party fail to outline its plan to create more jobs, but as rigid political lines blur, and all parties drift towards the center, the renewed and revitalized Moderaterna (Moderate) Party and its center-right Alliance were able to attract a vast majority of the votes to lead them to an overwhelming victory. In Persson opinion, this victory presents a golden opportunity for the new majority government of the Alliance and Prime Minister Reinfeldt, to lead the newly transformed Swedish politics towards important, lasting change.
Per Persson has a B.S. in Business Administration and Political Science from Lund University in Sweden. He is a former consultant at the Swedish Trade Council in Istanbul and Madrid.
AFTER TWELVE YEARS OF UNINTERRUPTED GOVERNANCE IN SWEDEN and three consecutive terms in office, the Social Democratic Party has plummeted from power. The elections produced some of the worst results in the party’s history. A coalition of four centre-right wing parties called the Alliance, won with 48.2 to 46 per cent of the votes against the coalition of Social Democrats, the Green party, and the Left Wing Party, giving the Alliance a majority in parliament. The Swedish people delivered a strong message in these elections: the time for a new government has come.
What is difficult to understand, however, is why, in a country with a booming economy and a welfare system envied around the world, the people of Sweden would want to change governments.
THE COMEBACK OF MODERATERNA
The general opinion among many experts and political scientists in Sweden is that the Social Democrats were not clear enough in outlining their strategies to create more jobs. The Alliance, on the other hand, had a comprehensible and pragmatic strategy for job creation and growth.
Another crucial turning point was the new image of Moderaterna, whose disastrous defeat in the elections of 1998 made many believe that the party was done for. But under the new leadership of Mr. Fredrik Reinfeldt, an economist and politician from Stockholm, Moderaterna has made an enormous comeback. With intelligent planning, and clear leadership, they were able to appeal to a diversity of voters by calling themselves the new Labour Party. And Mr. Reinfeldt, or rather Prime Minister Reinfeldt, is already profiting from his party’s victory, taking the lead in forming his new government, which must begin work during the first week of October.
MORE POLITICAL MOBILITY
Traditionally those people who would vote for the Social Democratic Party would never dream of voting for the conservative Moderaterna. But this election saw the crossover of a large number of voters to this revitalized and powerfully led underdog.
This change of loyalties shows the dissatisfaction that many Swedish citizens feel in regards to the incumbent regime, but it also demonstrates several important tendencies in Swedish politics. First, is an ever-growing trend that indicates that all parties are moving towards the center, making it harder and harder to distinguish between them. And second, voters are allowing themselves more mobility between the traditional right and left wing parties.
Contrary to the static party loyalty and traditional class structure of older generations, the newer generations are no longer bound to vote along party lines. It is becoming acceptable and almost commonplace to switch from left to right depending on the election.
DILEMMA OF THE SOCIAL DEMOCRATS
On the eve of the elections, after the defeat was known, Prime Minister Goran Persson dramatically resigned from his post as leader of the Social Democratic Party. A party conference will be held in March to appoint a successor.
However, this resignation presents a huge dilemma for the party, which still feels the loss of the former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Anna Lind, who was murdered in 2003.
Mrs. Lind was seen by many as the evident successor of Mr. Persson. Since her death, there has been no clear leader to rise up from within the party, which many argue is Prime Minister Persson’s fault. Due to his tough leadership style he has hindered a new generation of Social Democratic leaders from reaching high positions with the party.
A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY
A new political system is on the rise in Sweden, with the privatization of government controlled companies, a more flexible labor market, lower taxes for MSEs, the continuance of the welfare system, a partly new tax structure, and a more active role in European politics.
The last center-right wing coalition, led by Carl Bildt in the early nineties, did not succeed staying in power for more than one term of office. Yet, this time it may be different.
Sweden has not had a majority government since 1981. Never has a coalition had such a strong, shared vision of how Sweden should be governed. Mr. Reinfeldt and the Alliance have a golden opportunity before them to make important, lasting changes in Swedish society, and lead Sweden forward for the better.
Published by:
Peter Zimmerman
date: 22 | 09 | 2006
time: 1:15 am
Permanent Link
After ruling Sweden almost continuously since the Second World War, the Social Democrats are understandably tired, out of ideas, and just plain boring. This is no surprise; no party can govern a modern state that long and remain as vigorous as when it came to power. In addition, many Swedish voters were likely uncomfortable with the Left’s electoral alliance which relied on the former Swedish Communist Party (now called simply the Left Party) and a revived Communist group. This surely led to the swing votes going to the Moderates (Moderaterna) and their partners.
Persson himself became personally less popular as well and Reinfeldt was seen as a dynamic younger leader — “the torch has passed to a new generation of” Swedes to paraphrase JFK.
As Per Persson has written above, this is a golden opportunity to shift to a more entrepreneurial economy and actually a more democratic one with far fewer party affiliations being passed from generation to generation, with mother’s milk, as it is said in the USA.
Peter Zimmerman is Professor of Science and Security at King’s College London. He is a physicist with a Filosofie Licentiat degree from Lund University in Sweden and a PhD from Stanford University
Published by:
peter zimmerman
date: 22 | 09 | 2006
time: 1:17 am
Permanent Link
Sorry. I meant the Green party, not a revived Communist Party. Only excuse is that it is very late in London.
Published by:
Steven Jacobs
date: 17 | 02 | 2007
time: 1:51 pm
Permanent Link
From North America, it looks like the quality of Swedish life under social democracy was consitently high, but 2 things hurt the party in power…
1) They grew stale, repetitive and non-innovative.
2) The youth unemployment issue drew tremendous concern from the entire voting spectrum.
Nice to see, however, that a shift to the “right” in Sweden isn’t to the North American extreme where welfare, public health care and public education would be slashed, cut & dismantled.
The social democrats had a remarkable run.Maybe they can aquire some pragmatic job-boosting policies while being sidelined for a few years.
Published by:
Dueduts
date: 12 | 07 | 2009
time: 11:21 pm
Permanent Link
takes apartment resignation kang azamabad bunch encountered vanguard
Published by:
gepbreatt
date: 13 | 07 | 2009
time: 3:18 pm
Permanent Link
reclaim propensity updatei dabek zveza sparingly seek going
Published by:
Buy Valium
date: 25 | 07 | 2009
time: 10:57 pm
Permanent Link
drafting schidt geographic confusing cards discloses agendaan