Israel Zipper, Ricardo

Ricardo Israel Z. is the Chair of the Political Science Department at the University of Chile. He holds a PhD and a Master’s in Political Science from the University of Essex and he directs the International Center for the Quality of Democracy and the Legal and Social Science of the Autonomous University of Chile. He presides over the Committee of Armed Forces and the Society of the Global Association of Political Science. He has published dozens of books and essays that have been translated into several languages, and is the conductor and a commentator for Chilean political and international Radio and TV programs.

ARTICLES (7)

Hillary Clinton for Vice President?

Convenience should solve the issue for Barack Obama

By Ricardo Israel Zipper, 3rd July 2008

hillary.jpgWill Hillary Clinton join Barack Obama as his vice presidential candidate? The answer, which should be simple, is in fact very complicated and is perhaps the most delicate decision that Obama will have to make before arriving at the White House–that is, if he does indeed win, which today is still far from clear. Convenience should solve the issue.

Without comments

Where is Bolivia Going?

Negotiation is the only option in dealing with Santa Cruz de la Sierra’s claims to autonomy

By Ricardo Israel Zipper, 26th June 2008

evomorirstacruz.jpgBolivia never ceases to amaze. More than once in its history, when it seemed that Bolivia was on the edge of disaster, it has done an unexpected about face away from violent conflict. Is this what is occurring today?

Without comments

What Does the Increase of Food Prices Imply for the World?

Keys for confronting a global crisis that makes the poorest even poorer

By Ricardo Israel Zipper, 30th April 2008

rizhambre.jpg

Food increases because of the change in climate; the major revenue of emerging economies like China and India; the growing demand for biofuel and speculation, states the author. Find out what will happen in the next few years and what can be done to avoid the hunger of millions of people.

Without comments

Antarctica, a source of new conflicts?

The global dispute for control of the white continent begins

By Ricardo Israel Zipper, 15th January 2008

antartida1.jpgIt is easy to understand why there is interest in Antarctica; not only is it very probable that it has oil, gas and mineral riches, but it also has something that could be of even greater importance in the future, and which is neither possible nor probable, but unmistakably there: fresh water, of which Antarctica must be the largest known reserve.

Without comments

There are many more than “two models” in Latin America

What does Brazil need in order to become a true power?

By Ricardo Israel Zipper, 27th December 2007

Is Latin America divided into two models, as Europe maintains it is? For the author, it is actually diversity and heterogeneity that prevail. Paradoxically, in the forest of the distinct situations that exist today in Latin America, the success stories (Chile, Brazil, Peru and Colombia) are those that make less noise and receive less attention.

Without comments

The Iberian-American Summits: Is the glass half full or half empty?

Social cohesion and inclusion, central topics of the meetings in Santiago

By Ricardo Israel Zipper, 16th November 2007

What are the reasons for holding the Iberian-American summits? And for not holding them. Where does the skepticism come from? What was expected of Summit XVII in Santiago de Chile? Are these Summits justified? The Parallel Summit. The importance of face-to-face meetings. The debate about institutional quality in Latin America. Next, the first part of the analysis.

Without comments

The Cold War with Iran

Bush and Peatraeus: What has and hasn’t been said of public opinion

By Ricardo Israel Zipper, 25th September 2007

To what is the continued US strategy in Iraq responding? Mitigating the effects of a civil war… or surrounding Iran? Understand in the following what George W. Bush and General Peatraeus said in their joint appearance before Congress. And most importantly: what they didn’t say with respect to Iran. The return of contention.

Without comments

Close
Powered by ShareThis