Obama has an opportunity to do in Egypt what Bush tried and failed to do in Iraq

Posted by Martin Varsavsky, 15th February 2011

manifestantes-en-egipto-arrancan-un-cartel-del-presidente-hosni-mubarak-expandEgyptians fought bravely, ousted Mubarak and gave power to the military. But it turns out that USA effectively controls the Egyptian Army. It financed it, trained it and should it go into conflict with it, it can easily defeat it. So Egyptian people, whether they are aware of this or not, gave considerable power to USA. In Latin America and other parts of the world, giving power to US backed military would have been seen as a huge step back in time. So this situation must change quickly and in favor of the Egyptian people. It could also change in favor of US and EU foreign policy in the region.

Egyptians deserve speedy and easy visibility on how democracy will be instituted. Also, USA has to be very careful not to be associated with the Egyptian military, but instead with the democratic forces which hopefully will take power. It also needs to prevent the brewing of another Mubarak from inside the military, a military who like Hugo Chavez, after trying to take power as a military leader, changed clothes and took power through elections but behaves as a military dictator. The Egyptian people, USA, Obama and Clinton in particular, can emerge as winners in this revolution but there are many obstacles ahead.

After failing promoting democracy in Afghanistan and Iraq, USA has a chance to do in Egypt with $50bn what it could not do wasting $1 trillion. It can fund the stabilization of Egypt and prevent the rise of terrorism and Hamas type forces to arise out of discontent. Egypt can become what Iraq never became but it is still one of the poorest nations on Earth on a per capita basis and it quickly needs a stabilization fund. Right now what the new government has to prevent is food shortages and provide basic necessities for all. That needs short term EU and US Aid. In short, President Obama can do with Egypt what the Neocons wanted and failed to do with Iraq. Helping Egypt at this moment would be greatly appreciated around the world.

Lastly as soon as things calm down, we can all do our fair share and consider Egypt for our next holiday destination. This will help re start the economy.

Give your opinion

Obama Isn’t Trying to ‘Weaken America’

Posted by osurce, 14th February 2011

obama_contemptMichael Medved
2/14/2011

Some conservatives call the president the political equivalent of a suicide bomber: so consumed with hatred that he’s willing to blow himself up in order to inflict casualties on a society he loathes. Against this, Medved says the White House record of more than 200 years shows plenty of bad decisions but no bad men. For all their foibles, no president ever displayed disloyal or treasonous intent. He criticizes Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin for hyperbole in criticizing Obama. For 2012, Medved says Republicans face a daunting challenge in running against the president, which becomes impossible if they’re also perceived as running against the presidency.

Medved hosts a daily, nationally syndicated radio show and is the author of “The 5 Big Lies About American Business” (recently out in paperback by Three Rivers Press).

Link to full text in primary source.

Give your opinion

When it comes to politics, Obama’s ego keeps getting in the way

Posted by osurce, 17th December 2010

Michael Gerson
12/17/2010

Rather than celebrate a rare moment of bipartisan cooperation over the new tax deal, President Obama has gone on the offensive, skewering both Democrats and Republicans over the difficulty of getting the deal done. His actual governance has generally proven more effective than his politicking, but the president’s wont for saying the wrong thing is quickly exhausting his limited political capital.

Gerson is a nationally syndicated columnist who appears twice weekly in the Washington Post.

Link to full text in primary source.

Give your opinion

A Kindle for Christmas? Spare Me

Posted by osurce, 10th December 2010

Dan Newman
12/10/2010

Newman says he should be the perfect candidate for an e-reader: he owns thousands of books, lacks space for more, and often schleps several heavy volumes in his bag. So when he begged his family to refrain from getting him a Kindle for Christmas, they were confounded. Newman reflects on his enjoyment of actual books and notes that he remembers passages by where they are in his books–this or that detail is two-thirds of the way through, on the bottom left. Physical memory runs deep. Newman sees e-books as a companion format that will always share space with printed volumes and concludes that it’s best to read a book you can hold in your own hands.

Newman is a writer at work on his first novel.

Link to full text in primary source.

Give your opinion

Making Disability Work

Posted by osurce, 10th December 2010

Peter Orszag
12/10/2010

Disability insurance provides support for people who can no longer work because of a disability, but the likelihood that someone will re-enter the work force is almost nonexistent. There has been a spike in disability applicants, and Orszag says this is due to a weak labor market driving people who qualify for the program to apply because they cannot find work. He says the current economic downturn could cause a long-term reduction in workers. To counter that we need more stimulus immediately, an extension of unemployment insurance, and reforms of the disability program that encourages recipients to return to work. Orszag offers some program reform ideas.

Orszag, the director of the White House Office of Management and Budget from 2009 to July 2010, is a distinguished visiting fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.

Link to full text in primary source.

Give your opinion

The Emperor’s Nuclear Clothes

Posted by osurce, 29th November 2010

Nuclear bomb smokeStephen Peter Rosen
11/29/2010

If we deploy American military power, Rosen says we must do it like we mean it. The US needs to increase its ability to conduct non-nuclear war from undersea, from ships out of range of missile attack, and from bases on American soil by means of long-range missiles and aircraft, manned or unmanned, over the next 10 years. Rosen goes on to argue that the US must increase its ability to use cyber warfare and other unconventional means and to defend itself from retaliatory attacks in kind. Just as importantly, it must allow its allies to acquire the weapons systems and even nuclear weapons they need for their own defense. This will not be cheap, but it will be less expensive if we help our democratic allies arm themselves by transferring technologies to them, by working with them, and by encouraging them to help each other.

Rosen is professor of national security and military affairs at Harvard.

Link to full text in primary source.

Give your opinion

The wars we’ve left behind

Posted by Martin Varsavsky, 29th October 2010
    Michael Gerson
    10/29/2010

    The ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will have little impact on this year’s elections. Afghanistan in particular seems to have vanished from the national consciousness, perhaps because of a presumptive confidence in General Petreaus. Moreover, Republicans as a minority party are far less inclined to make the wars a politically divisive issue than were Democrats during President Bush’s tenure. With a selective and professional military that reflects American society less than it did fifty years ago, war and its role in national politics are destined to inhabit a smaller space in our collective awareness.

    Gerson writes about politics, global health and development, religion and foreign policy.

    Link to full text in primary source.

Give your opinion

The Next Two Years

Posted by Martin Varsavsky, 29th October 2010
    David Brooks
    10/29/2010

    Brooks offers a roadmap for recovery for President Obama if his party takes a defeat in Tuesday’s election. It includes winning back independents, redefining his identity, responding to the nation’s fear about decline, and building an institutional structure to support a more moderate government policy approach. Brooks looks at each in turn and says if Obama can implement this plan, his election in 2012 will be much rosier than this year’s election.

    Brooks is a New York Times columnist.

    Link to full text in primary source.

Give your opinion

Sandra Day O’Connor v. the People

Posted by Martin Varsavsky, 29th October 2010
    David B. Rivkin Jr. and Andrew M. Grossman
    10/29/2010

    The authors write that the sight of a federal judge dabbling in politics is odd. They refer to former Supreme Court justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who has been pitching a Nov. 2 Arizona state initiative that would replace judicial elections with “merit selection.” In addition to the robocalls, Justice O’Connor has appeared in a series of videos urging voters to approve the initiative as part of a year-long media blitz on “merit” selection. The authors question when a judge, sworn to “faithfully and impartially” apply law, may politick to change it. They believe Justice O’Connor’s activism creates a conflict of interest, which is why the federal ethics rules bar federal judges from direct fund-raising and speech-making for political organizations.

    Rivkin and Grossman are Washington-based lawyers. Rivkin served in the Justice Department under Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush.

    Link to full text in primary source.

Give your opinion