What peace question answers will Palestinians and Israelis deliver on the eve of the international meeting organized by American President George W. Bush this Autumn? And will these answers as they are proposed be enough to make the breakthrough needed toward two states for two peoples?
The Middle East “peace question”, again to debate
Returning to Clinton Parameters and Taba negotiations
The Cold War with Iran
Bush and Peatraeus: What has and hasn’t been said of public opinion
To what is the continued US strategy in Iraq responding? Mitigating the effects of a civil war… or surrounding Iran? Understand in the following what George W. Bush and General Peatraeus said in their joint appearance before Congress. And most importantly: what they didn’t say with respect to Iran. The return of contention.
Al Qaeda’s shade in Lebanon
The attack on Spanish troops, a terrorist debut of Fatah al Islam
Although the terrorist group Fatah Al Islam (Sunni) is in a consolidation stage, they still are far from replacing the Al Qaeda mark in Lebanon: this situation should be taken advantage of in order to neutralize their Yihadista’s aspirations before it is too late.
The UNIFIL in the Middle of an Internal Turmoil
By George Emile Irani (for Safe Democracy)
Why the attack against the Spanish contingent in Lebanon is a wake up call to tackle the urgent problems undermining stability in the country.
PLUS: Lebanon and the Salafist challenge, by George E. Irani
Who will do what in the Middle East now?
By Walid Salem (for Safe Democracy)
What motivations made Hamas commit this Coup d’etat now? For what reasons was it so easy for them to take control of the security forces? What should each of the state holders do directly or indirectly within the conflict? In the following you have the responses.
PLUS: Gaza Coup D’etat (Part I), by Walid Salem
The break between Gaza and West Bank and the peace process
By Mario Sznajder (for Safe Democracy)
Mario Sznajder believes that the violent conflicts between Hamas and Fatah in the Gaza Strip demonstrate the inexistence of Palestinian institutionalism in all its magnitude. The asymmetry between Israel and the Palestinian National Authority not only derails any negotiation but it generates a conflict of low intensity in which the Israeli society suffers, but the Palestinian society suffers much more, affirms.
By Arshin Adib-Moghaddam (for Safe Democracy)
Arshin Adib-Moghaddam applauds recent Iranian-American dialogue as a positive step, but notes that there are still many barriers stunting the growth of relations between the two countries. He adds that in order to continue progress, the people of both countries should criticize and check the State, and take peace into their own hands.
The Next Steps for Peace in the Middle East and West Asia
Opening dialogue between the West and Islam






