Michael Gerson
10/28/2009

Harvard professor Michael Sandel makes a practice of attempting to bring moral clarity to the choices inherent in a democratic society. His most recent efforts involve the definition of populist justice, which Sandel claims are utilitarianism (the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people) and individual freedom (whatever is decided between consenting adults is just). The professor critiques both of these definitions and has come to the conclusion that we are bound by more than individual choice in our decisions about right and wrong. A “communitarian” approach that recognizes moral convictions born of deep attachments may be the most just and moral way to govern society.

Gerson writes about politics, global health and development, religion, and foreign policy.

Link to full text in primary source.

Opinion summaries provided by Opinion Source, an organization with which Safe Democracy is associated